– hobbies –


This McCaig multi-year, human life threatening violent crime spree has persisted long enough, and is of sufficient potential consequence (for example of “consequence” please see “Category Video: Dog Deliberately Used As Autonomous Weapon, Deliberate Attack By Dog Owner James W. McCaig” at this domain) to warrant this domain. I have pondered cattleman McCaig’s motivation & intention.
Obvious possible (plausible) explanation: McCaig has tried to coerce me with physical violence to discourage me from transiting McCaig road frontage. Why? Perhaps my existence displeases McCaig. Oooohhh, the poor fella! Perhaps there are 3 possibilities:
1) It is that reason, or approximately that reason.
2) It is some other reason, rational or not.
3) It is for no reason. This 3rd explanation might be dismissed as duplicative, but is included here for thoroughness.

One might argue that McCaig bases, justifies his crime spree of threats and assaults against me because while I was legally bicycling on public roadway, I was ambushed by McCaig’s two vicious attack dogs.
McCaig’s vicious pit bull dogs drove me off the road again, and were closing in on me as lethal predators instinctively do.
Even if not rational, that might seem a plausible explanation for McCaig’s violent crime spree. It does not however explain the multiple vicious dog incidents perpetrated by McCaig BEFORE the killing of one of the two attackers. So we know as a certitude there’s more to this than simple retribution.
In fact, retribution is defined as: “Punishment administered in return for a wrong committed.
ANY such “retribution” by McCaig against me is impossible for reasons a, b, & c listed below. Retribution is impossible until a wrong is committed.

The day of that shooting I dictated an incident report to a New York State trooper. Immediately before my dictation I explained to the trooper:

“Trooper, it’s what’s known in law as the predicate act.
– The dog was shot in self defense.
– There can be no defense if there is no attack.
– There can be no attack unless the dog owner breaks the law.”

So even if it is conspicuously irrational that James W. McCaig would harbor resentment against his crime victim for the direct consequence of cattleman McCaig’s own dangerous criminal misconduct, what other more plausible explanation is there?
a) I have never broken the law against McCaig.
b) I have never told any lie against McCaig.
c) I have never done any wrong to McCaig. I’ll be delighted to persuade that in detail to the jury, if ever I am blessed with the opportunity.
And I hereby emphatically, vehemently urge ANYone including McCaig that challenges any of this to offer their perspective to provide counterpoint to this introductory post.

Falsely attributed to Albert Einstein, scholars say Einstein never said it: Repeating the same unsuccessful action again and again but expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.
Yet McCaig’s violent crime spree has persisted every year since the self-defense killing of one of McCaig’s two vicious attack dogs. How can we explain this McCaig criminal persistence?
– Perhaps McCaig is unintelligent enough to sincerely expect that if he persists for enough years, his failed crime spree will somehow magically succeed.
It hasn’t.
It won’t.
– Or perhaps McCaig has engineered this antagonism, this ongoing mortal combat deliberately, because he prefers or perhaps even enjoys it. There are numerous factual indications to support this explanation.
In this latter case, it is as if McCaig has made a hobby of McCaig’s years long violent crime spree against me.
I’ve tried desperately to get government to shut McCaig’s violent crime spree down. They refuse.

“If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em”?

If James W. McCaig has made a hobby of violating the law against me, enjoys continuing to both threaten to do, and attempting to do me serious bodily harm
I have now acquired a new hobby of my own, of obeying, complying with the law to defend myself AND protect our community.

That friends & neighbors explains my new hobby, McCaig.Info
It absolutely was NOT my first choice. Candidly, it is my last choice.

None the less I have legally purchased and legally own this McCaig.Info Internet domain.

Maintaining, operating this Internet McCaig.Info domain is my new hobby. “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.” We can thank James W. McCaig for it directly. If not for McCaig’s years long record of crime, this Internet domain would quite likely not exist at all.

In this new hobby of mine I fully intend to expand and improve the content of this domain to the degree that I can enjoy it. The not so bad thread at Still Images in this domain is an example already online awaiting your review. Please click the thumbnail image to expand the image for full screen viewing.
BUT !!
I consider the addition of direct crime scene video evidence against McCaig to be indefinitely suspended. In the parlance a great big rough tough cowboy can understand: – … don’t start no spit, won’t be no spit.

But if there is ever again any incident involving criminal misconduct against me, or any of our friends or neighbors, whether by McCaig directly, or by any of McCaig’s criminal accomplices, I need no additional permission, I need no further authorization, I need no additional approval that I don’t already have under our Constitution’s Article #1 in our Bill of Rights.
In this case the law does not require me to “prove” anything. If I wish to add legally obtained content to my Internet domain, I am entirely free to do so. That’s not “should’a, would’a, could’a”. It’s a Constitutionally enumerated right to add additional violent crime spree evidence to McCaig.Info
thereby demonstrating responsible citizenship for the purpose of promoting public safety.
If there is any further incident friends and neighbors, please forward the information to McCaig.Info so we can put this substitute for adequate government to the test.

If the content of this entry, or more broadly the content of McCaig.Info is in significant error or omission, I’m urgently depending upon and explicitly requesting James W. McCaig and or anyone else to clarify, correct, and even supplement this domain where appropriate. I intend to maintain full editorial control and legal compliance.

If no such clarifications or corrections are received I shall interpret that as tacit corroboration that the facts disclosed at this domain, however astounding, are deemed accurate by our neighbors in general, and by McCaig in particular, and that this evidence does not need clarification, correction, refutation or dispute.

your neighborhood bicyclist: December 11, 2023
may peace all ways be with you


4 responses to “– hobbies –”

  1. “a) I have never broken the law against McCaig.” asserted by the bicyclist in the introductory post of this topic / thread.

    Greetings friends and neighbors.
    This afternoon Thursday December 14 it has occurred to me, sticklers for accuracy might accuse me of deliberate falsification here, because incident to the self-defense shooting of one of McCaig’s two vicious attack dogs I left 3 spent shell casings on the West shoulder of Gray – Wilmurt Rd. opposite #1060 Gray – Wilmurt Rd, the location where McCaig’s ambush occurred. Littering is a violation of law, in my opinion. Therefore if guilty, the above quoted assertion “… never broken the law …” might be deemed incorrect, even if not deliberately deceptive.

    As a principle I do not countenance littering. If not for the mortal combat I’d have been inclined to recover the casings so as not to litter. But without the mortal combat there would have been none.
    I made an exception in this case, to mark the McCaig crime scene for police, imagining there might be an investigation. Before I got home * that day I discussed with investigating New York State troopers my reason for leaving the shell casings where they fell, to mark the scene, to document McCaig’s crime.

    That conversation would seem to me to be tantamount to a confession of littering, in my opinion.
    However: there is a centuries long-standing tradition in law enforcement known as “De minimis”. In layman’s terms De minimis means: of insufficient importance to warrant judicial attention.

    When I posted earlier this month: “a) I have never broken the law against McCaig.” I had forgotten marking this crime scene in this way. After all, I’m a retired seasoned citizen, and this crime by McCaig occurred most of a decade ago. It was not my intention to deceive. Instead, in the passage of the years, my memory has faltered enough for me to need several days to recall this detail.

    I now publicly confess it in the interest of personal integrity and public safety.

    If McCaig has been both threatening to, and attempting to severely injure me for littering, we may have a broader issue to contend with. I would like to believe littering is not important here.

    None the less, in the interest of full disclosure, and because I take personal integrity extremely seriously, I acknowledge my “lawlessness” (if it can be considered that under the circumstance) regarding this roadside litter. Had I done otherwise might I not be guilty of disturbing McCaig’s crime scene? “Destruction of evidence”? Shall we let the jury decide? Perhaps, or evidently NYSP has already made that decision.

    I should add, according to New York State Police Investigator Rose, NYSP conducted a two month long investigation of this shooting, apparently in search of a violation of law to accuse me of at law court. If not that, what?

    Approximately two months after the shooting Investigator Rose telephoned me to inform me the investigation was being closed. She did not mention littering in that conversation.

    Again, my apology for my inadvertent omission. No fraud or deception was intended. My memory of that day remains viable, but is not photographic.

    * McCaig, the criminal, called the police on his victim. What does that tell us about McCaig? Thus on a bicycle course that normally requires less than two hours to complete, I met NYSP about half-way through the course.

    note:
    It is intrinsic to the relationship between criminal and crime victim. The violent aggressor, in Ukraine’s case is Russia’s Vladimir Putin, now occupying sovereign Ukraine.
    President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine wants Putin / Russia out. BUT !!
    Putin the aggressor says no. And Ukraine remains at defensive War.

    It’s the same with McCaig. I never wanted any part of this. I transited #1060 Gray – Wilmurt Rd. frontage safely for years, before McCaig arrived. More information available for presentation at trial.

    Also please note, I’m not naïve enough to assume anyone will read much if any of what is posted at McCaig.Info
    Instead, this is merely a legal formality. It’s my way, the violent crime victim’s way of establishing the facts of this unbelievable McCaig years long violent crime spree for public review, but also establish the legal baseline should the matter ever go to law court.

    I’m painfully aware for example of how very serious it is to accuse public officials of colluding with the violent criminal who is to my knowledge the jurisdiction’s most dangerous violent serial criminal, James W. McCaig. I certainly do not do so lightly!
    But even though they don’t, I consider this an urgent matter, and am taking reasonable steps to promote public safety, incident to their dereliction.

    On a lighter note, 6 more shopping days ’til Christmas.

    Jimmy!
    I’m starting to enjoy my new hobby. You?

  2. Cocksucker , The so called killer dog is 19+ years old .
    He was rescued , Jimmy Hoffa from the ASPCA 16-1/2 Years ago . The vet told us he was approximately 2 to 3 1/2 years old from his dental records . He Is a member of our family .He has been An important part of our girls lifes .
    You have been an instigator and provoking our family for over 6 years now . You have tormented my two little girls for no reason .
    Your False allegation Sending a COMMAND to Hoffa so he could go in your direction . Complete opposite once again, another fairytale bullshit lie out of your mouth.
    The reason we need to clap our hands is he is deaf !!
    He can’t hear Hardly .
    He doesn’t respond and he can’t hear Unless you make a sound or yell to get his attention . Also, at his age, majority of his teeth are cracked and missing his food, needs to be prepared for him daily .
    This is my first and only time I’m gonna be answering you and I know you’re gonna remove the comment because you don’t have any balls to allow the public to voice their opinion how you are sick weirdo who has gone after numerous animals in the town of Ohio. You have single-handedly blinded, killed , harmed and abused several dogs in the town of Ohio . How you have not been investigated & arrested ? I believe someone just waiting for you to fall off your bike one day . But there is a God ! A animal can not defend itself .An animal can talk his way out of it or speak to ask a question . A animalcan not protect itself from you killing it I squeezing a trigger.
    I wish you would come after me and stand in front of me and pull a gun or try to spray Bleach in my face Like you’ve done to A innocent puppy in The Town of Ohio -On the opposite side of a fence.
    You are a bully . A piece of shit . A coward .
    You have a funny way of telling stories because I have the videotape of you provoking the dogs and you dischargthe your weapon aprox 22 ‘from my front door on a public street . How you were not charged is beyond me. I know your weapon was confiscated and destroyed . After the incident, you proceeded to go on your bike ride proceeding, traveling the opposite way of your home. by law, you were to notify the authorities of your actions of discharging your weapon. You failed to do that & possess any common sense. It goes to show how you are an idiot. You truly have no concern for public safety- discharging your weapon at two innocent dogs on their own front lawn . How are you in fear for your life when the dogs were 11 and 16 feet from you ? From the video we set up and measured that’s how we have measurements / proof . You killed the family pet on my daughters front lawn makes you feel like a proud man ?a proud American ?
    I’m gonna leave it at this and if anyone which I doubt even reads or pays attention To anything that you do in your life.
    You could do anything you want to me ring my bell. I’ll meet you in the street. I’ll meet you behind my house. I’ll meet you in your driveway. I’ll meet you in the middle of the woods. I’ll meet you on the courthouse steps.
    Do whatever you wanna do .
    My girls actually pray for you at night and they tell God to give Dempsey that was the dogs name that you killed Jack Dempsey he was a boxer pure Bread you Killed. murdered .
    Must make you feel good to kill a three-year-old and a six-year-old’s pet.
    You discharged a weapon illegally within 500 foot of A Residence. You didn’t report the incident . You intimidate my family when you continually drive by with video cameras and recording equipment Pointing it at children.
    But I would like to know as you’re proceeding and you see children playing out front dressed in bathing suits on their land swing – playing on their property. Why you would still Record children???? Point your camera up
    Tomthe sky and stop pointing on minors that are
    dress bathing suits most of the time in the summer months.
    Do you see how this is allowing? How many other people drive down the road recording children?
    If you’re unsafe going another route .
    It goes to show a lot of your mental stability how you’re the only person in Ohio that attacks animals and drives around with recording equipment .
    I do question your mental stability. I’d love to get a warrant and pull your hard drives off your computers and cell phone. I’ll volunteer mine anytime of the day.
    We never will know what your fixation was On purposely harming and killing innocent animals .Bully !!
    Six years you have the same clothes -same pants, same sneakers same shirt . Clearly, you have some sort of a sickness .
    Clearly, you have some sort of a mental condition .Why don’t you tell the public also why you have a concrete structure two stories high with two little pepe holes on the top ?? Why ? So you can put a weapon outside &
    point a weapon out towards the street .
    Obviously that’s to go against the authorities at some point.
    We’ve also heard your stories how are you harassed a innocent woman that was exercising – you purposely ran your bike into her and sprayed her with bear spray .
    I think you need to go in for a psychiatric exam .
    I don’t think the public / people up in Ohio are safe with you on the street . I think you should be incarcerated To a mental hospital .
    Why not Volunteer for a mental health evaluation ?
    I’m also going to consider posting the video of you killing my daughter’s dog. You killed a family‘s pet cold blooded on its own front lawn ! Murderer !
    That’s why your weapon was confiscated.

    I also I’m looking to get reimbursed for the cost of the dog, The thousands of dollars of medical bills from 2 local Veterinarians .

    Again, the only thing I ask, do whatever you choose to do to me – protect yourself and any way that you see fit
    But when you see my children, two innocent girls put the camera down or up to the sky No reason to record 2 underage girls .
    I am asking you that as a man .

    Respectfully ,
    JiMMY McCaiG
    5-11-2024

  3. 24/05/15

    To cattleman James W. McCaig, & all others:

    Cattleman McCaig:
    I appreciate the candid sample of your spectrum of self-inflicted anxieties resulting from your multi-year, human life threatening, violent crime spree against me. It often takes fewer words to accuse than to disprove.
    If I attempted to reply to each of your accusations all at once it would be wasted effort, an avalanche of factual detail even I your victim would find dull.
    For public safety I’ll start with credibility. You’ve disclosed numerous falsehoods in your #1 post. That renders this Internet interaction a contest of credibilities, yours against mine. I have the EVIDENCE J.W.!
    How can you realistically hope to fool them?

    Cattleman McCaig:
    You begin your tirade with the word “Cocksucker”, & end it with the word “Respectfully”.
    You undermine your own credibility sir. As Carnegie said: “All honor’s wounds are self-inflicted.”

    Regarding my credibility.
    #1) I’m resolutely determined to not disclose any detail regarding the James W. McCaig multi-year human life threatening violent crime spree that I’m not prepared to defend:
    – in a court of law
    – under oath
    – under penalty of perjury.
    If I lied even once it would undermine my credibility. Thus my meticulous accuracy and honesty in this entire matter. McCaig has already demonstrated such self-destruction here.
    ANY questions regarding the extraordinary details of McCaig’s violent crime spree are welcome. mccaig.info

    #2) To my knowledge:
    – I have broken no law against James W. McCaig.
    – I have told no lie, made no deliberate misrepresentation regarding James W. McCaig.
    – I have never done James W. McCaig wrong. To the contrary, my responsible public-safetyminded conduct may quite possibly have save J.W. his home and farm.

    I offer public apology for not expressing these introductory principles in fewer, clearer words.
    McCaig’s disclosure of 24/05/11 raises several points I’m willing to publicly address. But chief among them is the conspicuous fact unmistakably demonstrated by McCaig’s own words, that James W. McCaig is deeply emotionally invested in me.
    Conversely I have little interest in J.W., beyond that which is appropriate in this unusual, human life threatening situation.
    McCaig’s criminal aggressions against me have persisted for most of a decade. I’m in no rush to address McCaig’s numerous wildly inaccurate accusations. As my leisure time allows, additional information pending.

    All Best from 70+, the old man in the tower

    “Work is the curse of the drinking classes.” Oscar Wilde

  4. Just For Fun:

    Please do not misperceive the following as disrespect for bereavement.
    Instead it’s intended as didactic satire; insight to highlight workings of a fragile, ruthless, over-active ego.

    Cattleman McCaig:
    I would be a poor example if I acquiesced to mirror your narrative style. Instead, to metaphorically blow off a little steam I offer the following satire.
    Happy Memorial Day to one and all.

    “Six years you have the same clothes -same pants, same sneakers same shirt . Clearly, you have some sort of a sickness .
    Clearly, you have some sort of a mental condition .” McCaig

    Cattleman McCaig:
    While such public scrutiny of my bicycling apparel crisis is embarrassing, your keen fashion sense & reputation for accomplishment not merely as a cattleman but as a family man, inspirational. Thus you’re my obvious choice for my fashion supervisor.

    My trousers:
    they make my … you know, look too big. Right?
    I’m just not secure enough for blue jeans, too bold a fashion statement for me. You think plaid golfing knickers would be a suitable compromise? Tasteful without being too daring? Can you recommend a tartan?

    More important Cattleman, is my plunging neckline too flirtatious?
    Dial it back a bit? I’m considering rolling up just one sleeve, to remind everyone I don’t have to play by their rules man. Which arm? Show my tat ?

    ’til then, just wear my neon-pink Tuxedo?
    I thought I’d get no more use out of it after Mom’s funeral.
    I’m so excited Cattleman. At long last my bicycling fashion humiliation ordeal is over ! And when all the women I run over inquire about my exquisite ensemble, I’ll be sure to credit you McCaig, before I apply their bear spray.
    Yet once again sir, you are an asperation !

    “Clearly, you have some sort of a mental condition .” McCaig

    Equally clearly Cattleman, you haven’t?

    – special holiday bonus –

    “you killed Jack Dempsey he was a boxer pure Bread you Killed. murdered .” McCaig

    You adopted this dog believing it would spend less time loafing? Or did the shelter just butter you up a little?
    I have little patience for half-baked accusations. Fidelity to truth is what we knead here. It’s the yeast you could provide. Or are you only trying to get a rise out of me? If so, you have a recipe for disappointment. So far you’re doing a crummy job here McCaig. And if any of this ever goes to law court, your case is toast, no matter how you slice it.

    “We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark;
    the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light.” Plato

    End part I

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *