Since the original thread dated August 5, 2025 there has been additional criminal misconduct.

To avoid the appearance of metaphorically “sneaking around behind his back” I notified this subject by Certified U.S. Mail, informed him of the additional Internet disclosure, and the notification distribution.

The Certified U.S. Mail addressed to #399 was signed for on “8/8/25” [graphic withheld as signature by a potentially innocent third party].

On Monday morning the 11th of August I found my U.S. mailbox extracted from the ground post and all, door broken off, security feature removed, apparently stolen, and what was left deposited on the ground on the opposite shoulder of the road. Apparently vandalism this complex requires time for planning.

3 days. Coincidence?

Perhaps.

“Interesting” coincidence. The mathematical odds that it’s coincidental are approximately one in 2,945, in statistics (& common sense) considered unlikely.

To my knowledge the vandal has not yet formally confessed to law enforcement authorities.

But there does seem to be an implicit message here:

If this mailbox vandal and the anti-Constitutional traitor are the same malefactor the message is:

If the mailbox vandal was genuinely terrified of the bicyclist, and was equally sincerely concerned for the welfare of his children, then he’d have reason to avoid antagonizing the bicyclist. For such antagonism might place his children at potentially elevated risk of malicious retaliation. The message these crimes send? It’s safe to violate the law, to threaten violence and perpetrate vandalism against this senior citizen, low risk. Whether actually true or not, that’s the apparent message.

Yet somehow magically the same low risk neighbor suddenly seems to become high risk when the vandal’s feelings are hurt, his non-existent command authority disregarded.

Therefore the issue seems rather less about the children’s welfare, and more about the personal resentment of the homicidal vandal’s illegal command being disobeyed, simple perceived effrontery. His own non-existent command authority apparently a higher priority to the criminal than children’s welfare?

Bottom line, the subject is conspicuously unstable if prioritizing his own ego ahead of the welfare of his children.

The sanity check? The behavior in dispute isn’t an offense even as momentous as a fashion faux pas. He’s threatened murder over the exercise of a Constitutional right. Wouldn’t surprise me if he fancies himself a patriot too.

He’s not.